Legal Opinion

Tate v. Emery

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

This is a suit to enforce an oral agreement alleged to have been entered into by plaintiff’s daughter, Luella Thompson, and Charles Thompson, her husband, agreeing that upon the death of one of them the other should hold for life whatever property they possessed and that the survivor would, upon his or her death, will one-half of the residue to the heirs of the other. These parties were married on January 12, 1898, and. had no children. She died intestate on February 17, 1921, and at that time they owned property of the value of $20,000 or more, consisting of some $4,000 on deposit to their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Becker v. NeurathCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Rudd v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Hornbeck v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Plemmons v. PembertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Marston v. MYERS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Burghardt v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Taylor v. WaitOregon Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API