In re Gourlay
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.
The matter before the Court is an appeal from a bankruptcy court decision. The appeal concerns the attorney-fee agreement that the debtor, Robert Gour-*858lay, signed with Fregó & Associates (“Fre-gó”) before he filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court determined that the pre-petition fee agreement was a dischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. § 727, and canceled the agreement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 to the extent it required Gourlay to pay make payments post-petition. On appeal, Fregó concedes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Allan J. Rittenhouse v. Saul Eisen, U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Amc Mortgage Company, Inc., Debtor. Amc Mortgage Company, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. McDermott (In re White)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- In re MichelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Chanda S. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- HookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- KirvanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.