Legal Opinion

In re Gourlay

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 14, 2013No. 12-15223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.

The matter before the Court is an appeal from a bankruptcy court decision. The appeal concerns the attorney-fee agreement that the debtor, Robert Gour-*858lay, signed with Fregó & Associates (“Fre-gó”) before he filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court determined that the pre-petition fee agreement was a dischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. § 727, and canceled the agreement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329 to the extent it required Gourlay to pay make payments post-petition. On appeal, Fregó concedes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Allan J. Rittenhouse v. Saul Eisen, U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re: Amc Mortgage Company, Inc., Debtor. Amc Mortgage Company, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. McDermott (In re White)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  2. In re MichelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Chanda S. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. HookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. KirvanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API