Legal Opinion

Chanda S. Carr

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 22, 2020No. 19-20873Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY COVINGTON DIVISION IN RE CHANDA S. CARR CASE NO. 19-20873 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CHAPTER 7 FEE PRACTICES May an attorney limit the scope of their bankruptcy services to a prepetition analysis of a debtor’s bankruptcy options and filing the debtor’s skeletal chapter 7 petition? In short, if done properly, yes. Much has been written about attorneys’ attempts to “unbundle” services and “bifurcate” their fee arrangements in chapter 7 proceedings. By these efforts, counsel seek to avoid the result occasioned by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. In Re Homer G. Walters and Evolene Walters, Debtors. Charles L. Burd v. Homer G. Walters and Evolene WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re: William Kyle Kisseberth and Ekaterina Kisseberth, Debtors. Ronald R. Henderson v. William Kyle Kisseberth and Ekaterina KisseberthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API