Legal Opinion
In re Michel
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 8, 2014No. 12-49818PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR REFUND OF DEBTOR COUNSEL’S ATTORNEY FEE
THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case came before the Court for a hearing on the motion filed by the United States Trustee, entitled “Motion for an Order Requiring Debtors’ Attorneys to Return Payment to Debtor Pursuant to § 329” (Docket #20, the “Motion”). For the reasons stated in this opinion, the Motion will be granted.
*101I.Background and facts
The material facts regarding the Motion are not in dispute.
A. The pre-petition contract for legal services between Debtors and their attorney
Pre-petit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P. A. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Allard v. Coenen (In Re Trans-Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Albert Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates Law Offices of Melvin James Kaplan and Zalutsky & Pinski, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re: Brenda F. Hines, Debtor. Robert L. Gordon v. Brenda F. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Allan J. Rittenhouse v. Saul Eisen, U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chanda S. CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020