Legal Opinion
Ruiz v. Sylva
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2002No. B157433, B157803PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOPER, P. J.
Elections Code 1 section 11041, subdivision (b) requires that “[a]ll petition sections shall be printed in uniform size and darkness with uniform spacing.” We hold that this statute requires the use of a uniform typeface in the statement of reasons for the recall and the answer of the recall target. The petitions submitted to the South Gate elections official to recall Raul Moriel, Xochilt Ruvalcaba, Maria Benavides, and Albert Robles (Petitions) do not actually comply with section 11041, subdivision (b). The statement of reasons for the recall and the answers of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Ammerman v. CallenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. JefferyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JefferyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Strong v. Sutter County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.