Legal Opinion
Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP v. Orian
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 2008No. Civil Action No. 06-1543 (CKK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*251MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
This case arises out of a dispute over attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff Berliner Corcor-an & Rowe LLP (“BCR”) represented Defendants Global Horizons, Inc. (“Global Horizons”) and Mordechai Orian (“Orian”) (collectively, “Global”) in a matter still pending before the Department of Labor (“DOL”). BCR alleges that Global failed to pay a portion of BCR’s attorney’s fees in the DOL proceedings, and Global has counterclaimed alleging that BCR committed legal malpractice (among several other claims). Prior to the conclusion of discovery in this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Milligan v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Jones v. QuintanaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Graham v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Griggs v. Kenworth of Montgomery, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.