Legal Opinion
Jones v. Quintana
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2008-0620PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alexandria Jones, an employee of the District of Columbia’s Office of Unified Communications (the “OUC”), brings this action against the District of Columbia (the “District”) and Janice Quintana (“Quintana”), the former Director of the OUC. 1 Plaintiff alleges that she was retaliated against for voicing concerns about the manner in which the OUC intended to handle emergency “911” calls and non-emergency “311” calls and for filing a disability discrimination complaint with the District’s Office of Human Rights (the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guttenberg v. EmeryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Guttenberg v. EmeryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Parks v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San FranciscoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020