Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Robison

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1954No. S. F. 19061PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This action for “wrongful arrest and imprisonment” was tried by the court without a jury. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $900. Defendant moved for a new trial. The trial court ordered that the motion would be denied if plaintiff would consent to the reduction of the amount of the judgment to $700. Plaintiff consented to such modification. From the judgment as modified defendant appeals. We have concluded that the evidence and the supportable findings fail to warrant the conclusion that plaintiff is entitled to any recovery from defendant and, hence, that the judgment should be reversed.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hughes v. OrebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. MacKie v. Ambassador Hotel & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Gogue v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Mejia v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  3. Sokol v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cummings v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Floro v. LawtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API