Legal Opinion

MacKie v. Ambassador Hotel & Investment Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1932No. Docket No. 533PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Ambassador Hotel and Investment Corporation, a corporation, Frank Shannessy, and P. L. Leslie from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury, against the said defendants and E. M. Hull, jointly, and other defendants not appealing (the defendant E. M. Hull has taken a separate appeal) in the sum of $25,000, in an action for unlawful arrest and false imprisonment. Motions for new trial were made and denied as to these defendants appealing.

The arrest of the respondent Malcolm Mackie occurred on September 8, 1926. The evidence of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gisske v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mejia v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  3. Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sokol v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API