Legal Opinion

Floro v. Lawton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1960No. Civ. 24726PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a “judgment of non-suit" in favor of defendants in a malpractice action.

A résumé of some of the facts is as follows:

Mr. and Mrs. Floro and Mr. and Mrs. Burke lived approximately across the street from each other in Whittier. Mrs. Burke claimed that Mr. Floro had attempted to molest her on Saturday afternoon, August 6, 1955. On the next day, Sunday, at about 7 p. m., the Burkes, after talking with the Floros (at which time alleged slanderous remarks allegedly were made), went to the police station and there apparently Mrs. Burke related what had occurred and she wrote…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Dragna v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Goodman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Pete v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Maxon v. Security Insurance of New Haven ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API