Cashmark v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
George Cashmark (Claimant) has filed a petition for review from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), dated December 7, 1989, affirming the decision of the referee, dated September 16, 1988, granting the modification petition of the Great A & P Tea Company (Employer). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On August 4, 1978, Claimant suffered a lower back injury while in the course of his employment. As a result, Employer filed a notice of compensation payable providing for the payment of benefits to Claimant. Subsequently, on December 1,1986, Employer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lawrence v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Vas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mauger & Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Auto Service Councils of Pa., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Beres v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.