Legal Opinion

Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1985No. Appeal, No. 868 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Lukens Steel Company appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which af*56firmed a referee’s grant of fatal claim benefits to Sarah Hasie'y, for the death of her husband, Joseph. We must determine1 whether substantial evidence supports the referee’s findings and conclusion that Joseph Hasiey’s death arose in the course of his employment and was related to it, and was therefore compensable undqr §301 (c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,2 77 P.S. §411(1).

At the time - of his death, the decedent was employed as an inspector gang…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Dick's Delicatessen of Paoli, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Alcoa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Cashmark v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API