Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal filed by Nortim, Inc. (Employer) and William R. Rolick (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board). In No. 278 C.D.1992 Employer challenges the portion of the Board’s order affirming the referee’s decision to increase Claimant’s compensation benefits. In No. 384 C.D.1992 Claimant appeals the portion of the Board’s order reversing his award of attorney’s fees.
Claimant worked for Employer as a logging contractor since 1982 and his wages were fixed on the basis of his production output in the form of tonnage for pulp…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Cashmark v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- McConnell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Thissen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Arthur Shelley Trucking & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mason v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- LaChina v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Long v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Meredith Construct. Co v. John Alan HolcombeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Elliott v. El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.