Legal Opinion

Wertheimer v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1967No. 40398PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s blended motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding a directed verdict.

The action involved was instituted by Samuel Wertheimer against Nellie A. Byrd to recover $2,019.12 ($1,000 — the downpayment made pursuant to a contract dated July 1, 1963, for the purchase of real estate owned by defendant; $500 — money paid by plaintiff to secure the release of an exclusive sales listing previously made by defendant with a real estate broker; and $519.12 — damages claimed for expenditures made in improving the realty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Glaser v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. ZachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Knudson v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Abramson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bethurem v. HammettWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ortendahl v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hayle Floor Covering, Inc. v. First Minnesota Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Ford Motor Credit Company v. JordanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Bethurem v. HammettWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API