Legal Opinion

Bethurem v. Hammett

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1987No. 86-200Published

1Opinion of the Court

736 P.2d 1128 (1987)

Donald E. BETHUREM and Colleen Bethurem, Appellants (Plaintiffs),

v.

Edward L. HAMMETT and Elsie Mae K. Hammett, Appellees (Defendants).

No. 86-200.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

May 15, 1987.

Robert W. Brown of Lonabaugh and Riggs, Sheridan, for appellants.

Robert E. Holstedt of Holstedt Law Offices, P.C., Sheridan, for appellees.

Before THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT and MACY, JJ., and GRANT, District Judge.

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Buyers sued, raising breach-of-warranty issues, to rescind the purchase of a residence because the lot and structures encroached into the dedicated street. Sellers…

Also in this document: Dissent · Cardine; Dissent · Grant.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Purcell v. MinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API