Legal Opinion

Ortendahl v. Bergmann

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1984No. C9-83-1209PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This ease is an appeal by the defendant-purchaser from a district court judgment granting plaintiffs-vendors specific performance of a purchase agreement entered into by the parties following vendors’ auction of property described as “10 Main Street, Osakis, Minnesota.” Although the trial court properly admitted parol evidence to clarify the legal description, it completely changed the meaning of the contract by including lands of Burlington Northern Railroad, Inc., owner of a portion of the property. Plaintiffs-vendors were unable to deliver marketable title and specific…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carl Bolander & Sons Inc. v. United Stockyards Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Wittick v. MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Cleys v. CleysCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Strand v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Schuett Investment Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API