Legal Opinion
W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Co., Inc. v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 1999No. 98-1529PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Co., Inc. (‘Tates”) appeals the final decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”), ASBCA No. 47213, Contract No. DAHA22-92-C-0002. The ASBCA held that (1) Yates remained con ditionally bable to its subcontractor, Industrial Door Co. (“IDC”), and therefore Yates had standing to bring a claim of its subcontractor against the Army; (2) the Army did not violate 10 U.S.C. § 2319 regarding qualification requirements for subcontractors; (3) the Army did not violate the conflict of interest provision of 48 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Severin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- E.R. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The United States v. Dekonty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Oracle America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Emerald International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- O. Ahlborg & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.