Legal Opinion

Emerald International Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 13, 2002No. 01-258TPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

Plaintiff is a domestic coal broker that purchased millions of tons of coals during the years in suit. The price it paid for that coal included the cost of the coal excise tax imposed on coal producers under 26 U.S.C. § 4121(a), often reflected as a separate line item on its bill. Much of this coal was to be resold to foreign purchasers at or near the time of these purchases. Plaintiff brings this suit to recover the amounts it paid on account of the excise tax, asserting that the imposition thereof on its coal violated the Export Clause of the Constitution, art. I, § 9,…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Sterling Savings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  5. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API