Legal Opinion
United Insurance v. Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1942No. Calendar No. 41,810PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiff brings mandamus to compel the insurance commissioner to admit plaintiff to do business as an insurance company in Michigan under the provisions of Acts Nos. 71 and 75, Pub. Acts 1941 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1942, §§12312, 12390, Stat. Ann. 1941 Cum. Supp. § 24.91 and § 24.213). Both of these acts were duly enacted by the legislature and, after being enrolled, were approved and signed by the governor on May 12, 1941, and filed in the office of the secretary of State. They contained no provision giving them immediate effect. It had been the custom for many years past for the legislature to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. PulliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Attorney General ex rel. Zacharias v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Todd v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Katerndahl v. DaughertyIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Wyandotte Savings Bank v. State Banking CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- LeRoux v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- McKibbin v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Mandel v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.