Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. Pulliam
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 1934No. 24879PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
On July 25, 3933, the plaintiff filed in this court an original proceeding for writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as acting city clerk of Oklahoma City, state! of Oklahoma, to act upon referendum petition No. 5, presented by the alleged requisite number of qualified electors of Oklahoma City, Okla., praying for the submission of Ordinance No. 4475 of Oklahoma City, Okla., in the manner • required by law, and determine the sufficiency thereof, and in the event defendant find the same sufficient, immediately notify the chief executive officer of Oklahoma City of such finding in order…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Street v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Edwards v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Sherwood Bros. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Community Gas and Service Company v. WalbaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Dewey v. Doxey-Layton Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
- O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.