Legal Opinion

Todd v. Hull

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1939No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 40,467PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul H. Todd and Joseph M. Donnelly, individually and as two out of five members of the Michigan public utilities commission, filed a bill of complaint against defendants asking the court to declare the immediate effect provision of Act No. 3, Pub. Acts 1939 (Stat. Ann. 1939 Cum. Supp. § 22.13[1] etseq.) unconstitutional and void; to restrain defendants from entering upon or performing the duties imposed upon them as appointees under Act No. 3, Pub. Acts 1939; for a temporary injunction restraining defendants, pending suit, from entering upon the duties of the office of public service…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Frey v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United Insurance v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. J. E. Bejin Cartage Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API