Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Forest Hill State Bank

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1984No. 101, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

On this appeal we are called upon to decide whether the trial court erred in sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer to appellants’ Third Amended Declaration. Although parts of that Declaration are clearly defective (in that appellants sought compensatory damages for emotional distress allegedly arising out of the repossession of their automobile), we shall reverse because enough remains to present sufficient grounds for relief against an alleged unlawful conversion.

Appellants claimed, inter alia, that “the Bank” converted to its own use and wrongfully deprived them of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Jacron Sales Co. v. SindorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. TestermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Henderson v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Antonio v. SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Joseph Antonio v. SSA Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. Bohle v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. J.A.J., Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Nnadili v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API