Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Maryland National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 26, 1976No. [No. 32, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The single question presented here is whether appellant was entitled to recover punitive damages in an action for conversion stemming from the wrongful repossession of his automobile. In the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, the trial judge (Powers, C. J.) ruled that there was sufficient evidence to submit the punitive damage issue to the jury, which returned a verdict of $5,000. The Court of Special Appeals reversed in an unreported opinion, Maryland National Bank v. Ernest Henderson, Jr., [No. 407, September Term, 1975, decided March 17, 1976], holding there was insufficient…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. TestermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Vincent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. E.W. v. Rosemary DolgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. K & K Management, Inc. v. Chul Woo LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Newell v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Leese v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API