Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Leffingwell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, and is presented to this court upon the judgment-roll alone.
The action is upon a promissory note executed by defendant to one George W. Wittman, who, prior to the commencement of the action, indorsed the note to plaintiff.
The original complaint was demurred to upon the sole ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the point of the demurrer being that the complaint did not sufficiently allege nonpayment of the note. The allegation in the complaint in this regard is, “That no part of said sum of $630, or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McAndrews v. Chicago, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Eylenfeldt v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.