Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rega

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 2004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Robert Gene Rega, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it granted the Commonwealth’s motion for nolle prosequi without prejudice and without giving him notice or an opportunity to be heard. We hold Appellant must be given notice and an opportunity to oppose the Commonwealth’s motion for nolle prosequi. Accordingly, we vacate the court’s order granting the nolle prosequi, and remand the matter for a hearing on the Commonwealth’s motion.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal are as follows. In 2001, Appellant was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. EinhornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API