Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2005PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in granting the Rule 600 motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of Appellee, Malik Brown. We hold the court erred in dismissing the case against Appellee, where the Commonwealth exercised due diligence and did not engage in any misconduct designed to evade Appel-lee’s fundamental speedy trial rights. Accordingly, we reverse.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal are as follows. On April 14, 1999, John Wilson was shot to death at a playground in North Philadelphia.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BoozeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API