Talbert v. Farmers Ins. Exchange
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*602LANDAU, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment in his favor for fraud. He assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict as to his prayer for punitive damages. Defendants move to dismiss the appeal on the ground that plaintiff already has executed a satisfaction of judgment on the fraud claim and therefore is precluded from putting that judgment at risk in this appeal. Defendants also cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict on the fraud claim. We dismiss the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
The facts relevant to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weiss v. NORTHWEST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Baker v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Schlecht v. BlissOregon Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Jasmin v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Howmar Materials, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State Of Washington v. James Michael CarverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Talbert v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000