Legal Opinion

Talbert v. Farmers Ins. Exchange

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2000No. 95CV0172AB; CA A96591PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*602LANDAU, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment in his favor for fraud. He assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict as to his prayer for punitive damages. Defendants move to dismiss the appeal on the ground that plaintiff already has executed a satisfaction of judgment on the fraud claim and therefore is precluded from putting that judgment at risk in this appeal. Defendants also cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict on the fraud claim. We dismiss the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

The facts relevant to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weiss v. NORTHWEST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Baker v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schlecht v. BlissOregon Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Jasmin v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Howmar Materials, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State Of Washington v. James Michael CarverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Talbert v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API