Legal Opinion

Washburn v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 1991No. A8709-05933; CA A60355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions for mistrial and its failure to give requested jury instructions in this dental malpractice case. Plaintiffs cross-appeal the granting of defendant’s motions to strike their punitive damages claim. We affirm.

In March, 1986, plaintiff Dina Washburn went to defendant, her dentist, complaining of a toothache. Defendant concluded that the tissue in the tooth was dying and recommended root canal surgery. During surgery, a dental instrument perforated the tooth and entered the jaw bone, which allowed the material being used to fill the tooth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Osborne v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Charmley v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Leishman v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Donald H. Hartvig, Inc. v. Clackamas Town Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Faber v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Greist v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API