Gilbert v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff first contends that the order that a one-half interest in the marital home be conveyed to defendant was beyond the authority of the trial judge. Although the North Carolina statutes and decisions may not be entirely clear on this question, see, e.g., Taylor v. Taylor, 26 N.C. App. 592, 216 S.E. 2d 737 (1975); Spillers v. Spillers, 25 N.C. App. 261, 212 S.E. 2d 676 (1975); Clark v. Clark, 44 N.C. App. 649, 262 S.E. 2d 659, modified, 301 N.C. 123, 271 S.E. 2d 58 (1980), we find on considering them and the basic purposes of the alimony statute that the trial judge did not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Spillers v. SpillersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thornton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997