Legal Opinion
Chinchillo v. Powell
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2003No. CIV.A.98-1128 PLFPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Albert Chinchillo brings this action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. He alleges that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation discriminated against him when it terminated him for poor performance caused by his disability — severe depression. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff has failed to make out a prima facie case under the Rehabilitation Act. Based on the arguments and authorities presented in the parties’ briefs and the entire record herein, the Court grants defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Norden v. SamperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Buie v. BerrienDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Graffius v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Davis v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.