Legal Opinion
Davis v. Ashcroft
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 21, 2005No. CIV.A. 01-0331RBWPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought this action alleging violations of both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 and 794. After the completion of extensive discovery, the defendant has filed a motion for summary judgement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). Currently before the Court are (1) the Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mem.”); (2) the Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pl.’s Opp’n”); and (3) the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bell v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Mazloum v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Elhusseini v. Compass Group USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hollingsworth v. DuffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.