Legal Opinion
Graffius v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 11, 2009No. Civil Action 07-01875 (HHK)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Carrie Graffius, an individual with disabilities, was working as a program specialist in the Office of Facilities Management (“OFM”) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) when her em ployment was terminated on November 1, 2005. She brings this action against Eric K. Shinseki, 1 in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Agency, alleging that the VA violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 et seq, by failing to provide reasonable accommodations for her disabilities…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Doak v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Buie v. BerrienDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Faison v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Woodruff v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.