Legal Opinion

State v. Verdolini

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 29, 2003No. AC 22763PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Gary Verdolini, appeals from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation and committing him to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a term of three years, execution suspended after two years, followed by probation for one year. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly admitted testimony regarding one of the conditions of probation, (2) improperly admitted hearsay evidence and (3) failed to consider all of his circumstances in finding a violation. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

*467The following facts and procedural…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. State v. Francis D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. FelicianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. WidlakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. MayeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. State v. QuinonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. BoykinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. State v. HathawayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. State v. LanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API