State v. Maye
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*829 Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Soloman Maye, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and imposing a four year sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) deprived him of his federal and state constitutional rights to cross-examine and confront witnesses in denying his request to conduct an in camera inspection of a witness’ psychiatric records and (2) improperly found that he violated a condition of his probation on the basis of allegations that were not contained in the violation of probation warrant in derogation of his due process rights.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. RichardsondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LopesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. BrunetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. VerdoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. TaverasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.