Legal Opinion

State v. Maye

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 9, 2002No. AC 21814PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*829 Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, Soloman Maye, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and imposing a four year sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) deprived him of his federal and state constitutional rights to cross-examine and confront witnesses in denying his request to conduct an in camera inspection of a witness’ psychiatric records and (2) improperly found that he violated a condition of his probation on the basis of allegations that were not contained in the violation of probation warrant in derogation of his due process rights.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. RichardsondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LopesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. State v. BrunetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. VerdoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. State v. TaverasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API