Legal Opinion
State v. Francis D.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 2003No. AC 21599PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53-21 (2).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) permitted a constancy of accusation witness to provide expert *3testimony, (2) admitted into evidence the victim’s written statement that she had given to the police and (3) refused to allow the defendant to make requested offers of proof during cross-examination of two witnesses. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Th…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BetancesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Sherman v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.