Legal Opinion

Browning v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1967No. 37976PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langenbach, J. †

— This is the tale of two osteopaths who attempted a business transaction. The heart of the case is a certain promise which Dr. Browning made to Dr. Johnson. The sole issue is whether Dr. Browning is to be bound by his promise.

Browning and Johnson entered into a contract of sale whereby Browning was to sell his practice and equipment to Johnson. Both parties and their attorneys believed the contract made to be completely valid and enforceable. Before the contract’s effective date, Browning changed his mind about selling and sought to be released from the obligations he had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sykes v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Rogich v. DresselWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Cook v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Failor's Pharmacy v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API