Legal Opinion

Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1909No. 7860PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Zent, J., entered June 6, 1908, upon granting a non-suit, after a trial before the court and a jury, in an action by a vendee to recover damages for fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 3d day of November, 1906, the plaintiffs and the defendant The Benton Water Company entered into a written contract wherein the water company-agreed to exchange sixty acres of land, with a perpetual water right for irrigation purposes, situate in Benton county, for one hundred and fourteen acres of farming lands situate in Whitman county. The lands of the plaintiffs were particularly described in the contract by references to the government surveys, but the only description given of the water company’s lands was the following: “All that part of the

Northeast quarter of section…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Strand v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. O'Connor v. LighthizerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Watson v. MoldenIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Noyes v. BeldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Sorrell v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API