Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Richeson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1952No. 31890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was brought to recover damages suffered as the result of an alleged conspiracy conceived and executed by defendants. Plaintiff alleged that by concerted acts defendants had seized possession of, and had forced him to sell for less than their true value, a certain truck and trailer.

The action was tried to the court sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the court announced its oral decision for plaintiff, saying in part:

“I am of the opinion that the acts of the named defendants amount to a conspiracy, whether by agreement or not, but I think you can infer an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eyak River Packing Co. v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lyle v. HaskinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Capper v. CallahanWashington Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Corbit v. J. I. Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. John Davis & Co. v. Cedar Glen Four, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ashley v. LanceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API