Simpson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
A jury convicted Derrick Simpson of first-degree murder while armed and related weapons offenses. On appeal, Simpson contends that the trial judge erred in allowing the prosecutor to make so-called “fear-based” arguments during rebuttal argument. We affirm.
I
Simpson’s claims in this court relate to two prosecution witnesses, each of whom provided testimony at trial inconsistent with his prior statements. The first witness, Harold Hymes-Brown (Hymes), testified that he saw Simpson “pull[ ] out his gun” and fire it at the decedent. On cross-examination, Hymes was impeached with two separate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Teoume-Lessane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Appleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Woodard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.