Legal Opinion

Simpson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2005No. 02-CF-23PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted Derrick Simpson of first-degree murder while armed and related weapons offenses. On appeal, Simpson contends that the trial judge erred in allowing the prosecutor to make so-called “fear-based” arguments during rebuttal argument. We affirm.

I

Simpson’s claims in this court relate to two prosecution witnesses, each of whom provided testimony at trial inconsistent with his prior statements. The first witness, Harold Hymes-Brown (Hymes), testified that he saw Simpson “pull[ ] out his gun” and fire it at the decedent. On cross-examination, Hymes was impeached with two separate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Teoume-Lessane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Appleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Woodard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API