Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Haim v. Mathues

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 25, 1927No. 3549PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The single question on this appeal arose under section 1014 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 1674) and concerns the validity of an order for the arrest of Albert Haim, the appellant, in the district of his residence and his removal to a district in which he had been in-dieted.

The appellant, residing in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was indicted with many others by a grand jury in the North*23ern District of Ohio for conspiring to violate a law of the United States, namely, the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.). Desiring his removal to Ohio,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Tinsley v. TreatSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. GaultSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. BeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. United States ex rel. Tassell v. MathuesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. MayerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Lefkowitz v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  3. United States ex rel. Mayer v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  4. Swan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  5. United States ex rel. Povlin v. HechtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API