Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. Gault
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 3, 1926No. 513PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The relator was indicted for violation of the Anti-trust Act of July 2, 1890, (c. 647,) in the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio. He appeared, upon notice, .before a Commissioner of Ottumwá, Iowa, and after a hearing he was ordered to be held for removal. Rev. Stat. § 1014. The relator thereupon applied to the judges of the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the indictment was bad and that the Commissioner rejected evidence that the relator was innocent and that therefore there was no probable cause to *149believe him guilty of a crime in Ohio. He also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Tinsley v. TreatSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- United States Ex Rel. Kassin v. MulliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- In the Matter of Jan Alf Assarsson, Relator-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Gasque v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.