Tinsley v. Treat
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. . The facts are stated in the:opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
In May, 1906, the grand jury in the United States Circuit Court for the Middle District of Tennessee returned an indictment against thirty corporations, two partnerships, and twenty-five persons, as defendants. This indictment contained six counts. Generally speaking, the first, second, fourth and fifth charged the defendants with violating section 1 of the act of Congress approved July 2, 1890, entitled “An -act to protect trade and commercé against unlawful restraints and monopolies;” and the third and sixth counts charged them under section 5440 of the Revised Statutes. In July, 1906, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Greene v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by100 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Harlan v. McGourinSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.