Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Tassell v. Mathues

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 16, 1926No. 3454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Barney Tassell and Samuel Tassell, were indicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, with a number of other defendants, for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.). They were arrested and taken before a United States commissioner in the Eastern district of Pennsylvania under section 1014, R. S. (section 1674, Comp. St.), and, after hearing, the commissioner held them each in bail pending an application to the court for a warrant of removal.

S…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Rodman v. PothierSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Gayon v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. MayerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. United States ex rel. Haim v. MathuesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  3. United States v. WinstonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Lefkowitz v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  5. Bonaventura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API