Legal Opinion
Appeal of Stetson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 18, 1994No. 92-362PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The petitioner, Carl D. Stetson, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Department of Labor Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying workers’ compensation benefits based upon its determination that Stetson’s claimed injury, a 100 percent occlusion of his left anterior descending artery, was not the result of stress generated by his employment. We affirm.
The petitioner suffered severe chest pains, sweating, and fainting on May 7, 1990, while employed by Berlin City Ford. He was taken from the dealership to the Androscoggin Valley Hospital where he was admitted as a cardiac patient.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Hampshire Supply Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. MichaelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Appeal of LambrouSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Averill v. Dreher-HollowaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Appeal of DellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of GamasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.