Legal Opinion

Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. Michael

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 1992No. 91-031PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiff, Katina Tzimas, appeals an adverse decision by the Superior Court (Goode, J.) on her workers’ compensation claim against the defendants, Coiffures By Michael and the Hartford Insurance Company, pursuant to RSA chapter 281-A (Supp. 1991). We affirm.

The plaintiff was employed by Coiffures By Michael as a hairdresser from November 1987 until her injury on January 11, 1989. The plaintiff’s work as a hairdresser frequently required prolonged periods of standing behind or next to a customer with her hands raised, as well as various cleaning tasks. In mid-December 1988, Tzimas began to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Supply Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. Town of Hudson v. WynottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Town of Goffstown v. MorgrageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Bartlett Tree Experts Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Sandra G. Wilder v. Warren F. Eberhart, M.D., and Concord Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. The LLK TRUST v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API