Legal Opinion

Appeal of Gamas

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 19, 1994No. 92-664PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The petitioner, George Gamas, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Department of Labor Compensation *488Appeals Board (board) denying workers’ compensation benefits based upon its determination that the petitioner failed to prove that he was totally disabled. We affirm.

The petitioner was employed as a laborer by Anheuser-Busch in 1980 when he injured his lower back due to heavy lifting in the course of his employment. He was diagnosed as having a strain of the lumbar spine and a herniated lumbar disc. He developed debilitating psychological problems during the following year. According to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. MichaelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. In re CorreiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Averill v. Dreher-HollowaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Appeal of StetsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. In re BlackfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Appeal of DellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. In re of AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. In re FaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API