Legal Opinion
Nash v. J. Arthur Warner & Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 30, 1955No. Civ. A. 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, 52-4PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
1, These are four related actions, filed January 17, 1952. Like Carr v. Warner, D.C., 137 F.Supp. 611 (to which reference will be made from time to time hereafter) each of these actions is alleged to be based upon § 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77q, §§ 10(b) and 15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 78 j (b), 78o(e), and rules and regulations of the SEC adopted thereunder, and each of them, in general, follows the pattern of the complaint in the Carr case. Jurisdiction to hear this controversy likewise is asserted to rest upon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carr v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.