Legal Opinion
Moscarelli v. Stamm
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 22, 1968No. 67-C-520PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is an action by the plaintiffs individually and on behalf of others who purchased securities during 1965 and 1966 through the brokerage firm of A. L. Stamm & Co., to recover damages for losses resulting from numerous trades on a national securities exchange. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 77v and 78aa.
Defendants (partners of A. L. Stamm) move to dismiss the action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., and the plaintiffs cross-move for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.