Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson and Personal Products Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the February 4, 1983, March 15, 1983 (219 USPQ 214), and April 5, 1983, 573 F.Supp. 1179 (219 USPQ 217), judgments of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, sitting without a jury, holding that Kimberly-Clark Corporation’s Roeder patent No. 3,672,371 (’371) issued June 27, 1972, for “Sanitary Napkin with Improved Adhesive Fastening Means” was not infringed, “unenforceable” because of “fraud on the PTO,” and invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm the holding of non-infringement, reverse the holdings of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.