Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Teegarden
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1986No. A017464PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
Byron Teegarden (husband) appeals from that portion of the interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage denying him an award of spousal support. He contends the trial court abused its discretion (1) in denying him a continuance when he was unable to attend the trial due to his illness; and (2) in denying him spousal support and refusing to retain jurisdiction over the matter.
Facts
Husband and wife were married December 18, 1971, and separated June 5, 1979. There were no children.
Until husband became ill in 1977, both had been gainfully employed. While his illness was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.M. v. W.T.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Sierra v. Kremer CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015